“STUDENTS’ FEEDBACK AND ADMINISTRATORS’ CLASS OBSERVATION AS DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS AT UNIVERSITY OF TRIPOLI, FACULTY OF NURSING: A CORRELATIONAL STUDY.”

Date

2023-1

Type

Conference paper

Conference title

Author(s)

Maria Cristina Arboleda Taladro Tinay

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the teaching effectiveness of Faculty members at University of Tripoli, Faculty of Nursing based on Students’ Feedback and Administrators’ Class observation visits. Specifically, this study answered the following questions: 1) What are the Faculty members performance evaluation based on students’ feedback? 2) What are the Faculty members performance evaluation based on Administrators’ class observation visits? 3) Is there any significant relationship on the Faculty member performance evaluation based on students’ feedback and Administrators’ class observation visits? The findings that the researcher was able to extract from the study were: 1) that based on students’ feedback, 93.3% got the rating of “Good”, 6.6% “Fair”. It is worthwhile to note that there was no Faculty member who were able to get a rating of Poor. 2) that based on Administrators’ evaluation, 20% got the rating of “Excellent”, 33.3% “Very Good”, 33.3% “Good” and 13.3% “Fair”. It is worthwhile to note that there was no Faculty member who were able to get a rating of Poor. 3) there is a weak positive correlation between the students’ feedback and administrators’ evaluation as statistically analysed utilizing pearson momentum correlation which yielded a result of r=.35. Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn: It can be said that the Faculty Evaluation at University of Tripoli, Faculty of Nursing, based on Students’ Feedback and Administrators’ Evaluation showed effectiveness on the Faculty member provision of quality education to students. However, it proves that there is weak positive relationship among variables and that students’ feedback should be treated as different entity as that of Administrators’ evaluation.