Statement of the relationship between international criminal law, international humanitarian law, and international human rights law and their dimensions.
Understanding the general framework of criminal law.
In-depth study of the chosen subject, which is international criminal justice, and defining the subject of the International Criminal Court.
Linking the theoretical and jurisprudential side of the subject with the practical side, by studying the relationship between Libya and the International Criminal Court that arose between Libya and the Criminal Court that arose under Security Council Resolution No. 1970 (2011).
Intended learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding
Familiarity of the student with the theoretical framework of the chosen topic.
Training him to link the information he obtained with reality.
An attempt to explore future prospects for the subject under study.
mental skills
Training the student to use the information he received in the field of scientific research.
Training students to think creatively.
Training the student to be free from the indoctrination method in the study.
Practical and professional skills
The student should acquire the ability to deeply understand the relationship between international criminal justice and national courts (the principle of complementarity).
The student must accurately distinguish between the nature and jurisdiction of each of the existing international courts.
Helping the student to acquire the skill of linking the jurisdiction of the international criminal judiciary, and what is happening on the ground in terms of violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
General and transferable skills
The student should be able to communicate and communicate.
The student should be able to use modern technology.
Encouraging and training the student to work within a team.
In-Depth General Penal Code (LW611)
Criminal Policy (LW614)
Criminal Procedure Code (LW612)
Criminal International Law (LW613)
Teaching and learning methods
lecturing.
Panel discussions.
Preparing worksheets by students and discussing them in the lecture hall
Methods of assessments
The first evaluation of the work of the year (preparation of working papers) 20%
The second evaluation, the mechanism of the oral exam, 30%
Final evaluation Mechanism of the written exam 50%
